This week, I dedicated focused efforts to refining my paper, delving into each section for clarity and depth. Concurrently, our team maintained an active engagement in community research, fostering connections and ensuring our work aligns with real-world experiences. Simultaneously, our commitment to comprehensive literature reviews persisted, extracting valuable insights. The collaborative synergy within the team shaped a dynamic environment, propelling our collective exploration.

This week was all about deep-diving into comprehensive data analysis, immersing ourselves in the rich tapestry of literature reviews. Our exploration spanned a spectrum of topics, each shedding light on crucial themes within our field.

For the literature review, we analyzed the charted evidence, meta-findings that formed a foundation for our paper idea. The process extended to a thorough review of the data analysis protocol specifically tailored for focus group data. This phase was characterized by a dynamic interplay of trial and error, emphasizing our commitment to refining our methodologies for robust insights.

This week, our attention was devoted to the intricate logistics of the community research group. We delved into thought-provoking questions, exploring the potential of community accountability boards as instruments for fostering accountable action and transparency within the realm of culturally competent human-centered technologies. It’s a dynamic inquiry that seeks to enhance the intersection of technology and culture.

Throughout this week, my primary focus was on intensifying my efforts within the realm of the literature review. I engaged in meaningful discussions with PhD students, collaborating closely with them to enhance the clarity and organization of our charted papers for analysis in the literature review. Leveraging the capabilities of Atlas.ti, we systematically reviewed and extracted crucial data from the selected papers.

ChatGPT ChatGPT This week, the cross-validation I had implemented for sources from earlier weeks proved to be successful after making some adjustments. Specifically, modifications were made, and the graduate students were able to navigate through the process seamlessly.

This week proved to be relatively shorter, allowing me to delve further into the scoping literature review. Simultaneously, our focus shifted towards the meticulous planning of community-based research initiatives. Notably, Jay was absent from the office during this period.

This was the first week of the summer research in which we discussed community-based research and explored potential survey efforts set to launch in a month. The survey’s design was influenced by the previous week’s planning. Our focus was on collecting pertinent data aligned with our research objectives, especially in the realm of Automated Speech Recognition.

During Week 1, I began this week with by familiarizing myself with the research topic and goals for the week. The main objective was to implement a cross-validation process with PhD student collaborators to emphasizing transparency. To achieve this, I created a validation process for validating inclusion criteria sourced from relevant papers.